Whose side is the BBC on anyway?
I saw an interview with an eyewitness who was so concerned that the terrorist being chased fell. He may also have been pushed before being shot and (tut tut) he was not armed. The implication the twat was making that he was shot in cold blood. What a load of bollocks, police were defending their own lives as well as his and the rest of the public. He could easily have had a strap on bomb hidden. Still it is a shame for Bliar’s wife will have one less to defend! (She is a left wing laywer to our American friends.) Suicide bomber cannot be taken prisoner for the obvious reasons, and there is most likely a shoot to kill policy in place anyway for these bastards.
These nutters being put up by the BBC are probably on their payroll, being the cynic that I am. What about the social worker that saw a chap being mugged, she went over to him after he was picking himself up from the ground all bloodied and shocked from being robbed and attacked in broad day light in Bliar’s multicultural London and said “I wonder what could have made him do that”! Ah the joys of living in Alice’s Wonder Land!
<< Home